Home arrow Blog
Jun 13 2010
The Path
Written by JD Johannes   
Sunday, 13 June 2010

"Where are you flying today?" the Delta Arlines agent asked.

"Kansas City to Atlanta, Atlanta to Paris, Paris to Dubai. Then I take a small regional airline to Kabul, Afghanistan."

"Sounds like the trip of a lifetime!"

I've made the trip of a lifetime several times. This will be my seventh trip to the wars in five years. One trip may be an outlandish mid-life crisis. Seven surely qualifies me for some type of clincal diagnosis.

I am certain that multiple trips to wars have changed me, but I am not sure what those changes are.

Every story, at least every narrative story people will actually pay attention to is about how a person changes. The 12 Steps of the Path of the Hero, also known as the monomyth, articulated by Joseph Campbell result in the hero changing. I am not a hero by any stretch, and luckily classical heroics are not required for the path, just the 12 steps, one of them being a change or transformation.

In the classic post-modern monomyth the transformation is Luke Skywalker becoming a Jedi or Neo becoming The One. My transformation, if any, has been decidedly less dramatic--at least from my point of view. Sure I've dodged a few bullets, but I just dove to the ground rather than doing the limbo in slow motion.

The path of the hero is also called the monomyth because the basic steps apply to every story ever told by humans--at least the compelling, entertaining stories people actually cared to remember. Without a few of the steps, the story falters and becomes much less enjoyable.

The 12 steps of the path of the hero, include:

1. Hero In Natural Environment

2. Call to adventure

3. Reluctance

4. Encouraged by wise man

5. Cross Threshold

6. Tests and Helpers

7. Cave

8. Supreme Ordeal

9. Sieze the Sword

10: Transformation

11. Road Home

12. Elixir

Whether the human brain's preference for these steps is instinct or conditioning is a matter of occasional conjecture, but the fact is that for mellenia every enduring story has had the same basic steps--even non-fiction stories like Michael Lewis' The Big Short, a story about hedge funds that made billions in the mortage meltdown, follow the steps.

Our brains like the path so much we will rearrange facts and the sequence of reality to make things fit the narrative. In the social sciences this pheonomena is called narrative bias. An offshoot of narrative bias occurs in the news media when stories are ignored or spiked because they do not fit the predispositions of the reporters and/or editors.

The brain's bias for a story architecture that fits a sequence of steps is a problem for explaining the why and how of my multiple trips to the wars. The reality doesn't fit the narrtive your brain prefers and does not culminate in a transformation--at least not one that I can discern. (I've thought about inventing one, if for no other reason than to make a book proposal that will likely catch the eye of a publisher.) Without a clear transformation and triumph the story of the last five years of my life is without a point.

It hasn't been pointless, but there is not a clear, concise point. There has not been a clearly defined purpose or adversity to overcome. There has been no final gunfight, yet.

My adventures in the wars, like the wars themselves, do not fit the nice neat narrative the brain prefers. There was no final battle in Iraq and there will not be one in Afghanistan. Iraq is slowly fading and Afghanistan--the good war, the war of necessity--has lasted longer than the attention span of the viewing public.

The wars drag on, I keep going to them.

On this trip I'm going to try something different. Normally I fill this space with the usual point of view reports news/analysis reports, photos and travel notes. I will still do that, but I will also throw in more memoir(ish) material, thoughts, observations and reflections on five years of living in two incompatible worlds.

It has been the living in two worlds that has had the most profound effect on me. It is not a day-in-day-out effect. The effect usually manifests when a person discovers the life I live, where I have been, what has happened to me, what I have done. It is then that I realize how I live in the real world--the world of AK-47s, car bombs, beheadings, suicide bombers, poverty, filth and disease. I do not live in the plastic world of grocery stores, strip malls and orderly vehicular traffic. I visit the plastic world for long periods of time but I do not feel comfortable in it. I like the plastic world much more than the real one. I like airconditioning, reliable electricity, potable drinking water and food that won't make me sick.

When a person who only knows the plastic world meets me, I realize that there is something wrong with me. I put a lot of effort into going to the wars--a concept that even many soldiers shake their heads at.

I am now in the process of leaving the plastic world for the real world. I type this in the international depatures terminal of Atlanta-Hartsfield International Airport. The nexus of the real world and the plastic world is in airports. Most people are traveling from plastic to plastic, but every so often they cross the path of those with the means to escape the real world or those who seek it out.

Time to board the plane to Paris, en route to Dubai.

 
May 11 2010
War Memoirs
Written by JD Johannes   
Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Jules C. is starting a running series of reviews of two Iraq War memoirs--Rage Company and Kaboom.

I've thought about writing my own memoirs and even had conversations with literary agents, but I think I need to be finished running around the wars before I write a memoir about my adventures running around the wars.  (Speaking of which I'll be jetting off to Afghanistan soon.)

The challenge with my memoirs would be utter idiocy of what I have done...imagine the blurb description on Amazon.

"JD Johannes quit a good job as a political appointee and campaign operative, bought a TV camera and ran off to Iraq with his old Marine Corps unit as an embedded reporter.  He was pretty good at the work, combat didn't bother him much, so he kept doing it for five (or more) years.  When the wars ended he got some dude elected to a down ballot state-wide office and resumed his mundane life.  He also writes silly workout books."

Okay, maybe I could come up with something flashier than that but those are the basic facts I have to work with.

 

 
Nov 26 2009
Thanksgiving in Tikrit, Iraq
Written by JD Johannes   
Thursday, 26 November 2009

Over the Tigris river, through the desert and through a rough neighborhood where people occasionally throw RKG-3 anti-tank grenades at US military vehicles......we drove. 

Not to Grandma's house--but one of Saddam's old palaces for Thanksgiving Dinner at the old FOB Dagger. 

 dismount.jpg
A Soldier from the 4th BDE, 1st Infantry Div. walks down Bridge Street in Tikrit, Iraq on Thanksgiving day.  Soldiers occasionally dismount and walk along the rode to prevent an RKG-3 attack.  Throwing an RKG-3 when Soldiers are dismounted would be really stupid.  No one did, another reason to give thanks.
 mrap.jpg
MRAP Caimans driving up Bridge street in Tikrit.
 dagger.jpg
 The Headquarters of the Iraqi Army's 4th Division at the old FOB Dagger
 chow-line.jpg
US and Iraqi Soldiers ate Thanksgiving dinner together.  The food was Army rations heated up and served from plastic tubs.
 chow-line-2.jpg
 table-1.jpg
Iraqi and US Soldiers enjoy Thanksgiving dinner at a banquet hall in one of Saddam's old Palaces.
 table-2.jpg
 table-3.jpg
 pies.jpg
Pumkin pies and Iraqi pastries were served for dessert.
 jd.jpg
JD Johannes, another day on the job in Iraq.
 soldiers-2.jpg
Another day on the job in Iraq for the Soldiers as well.
 soldier-1.jpg

 

JD relies on viewer support to help reporting from the war zone. Please hit the tip jar or buy a dvd.
 
 btn_buydvd.gif

 

 
Nov 11 2009
Veterans at Work on Veterans Day
Written by JD Johannes   
Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Sala ad Dihn Province, Iraq-- 

In the US many Americans barely notice Veterans Day.  The banks and post offices are closed.  Federal Employees have the day off.  Some states and local governments may be closed. 

There are ceremonies and memorial services. 

But here in Iraq it is another day at work in a combat zone. 

The Soldiers of the 1-28 Infantry, the Black Lions, went about their work. 

 

soldier.jpg

I went with a Platoon to the city council meeting in Ishaki, a small town south of Samarra. 

The Platoon Leader sat back during the meeting and let the Iraqis do their work.  After the meeting he talked about the timeline of some development projects with the Council President. 

 

lt-enderman.jpg

The meals were the normal rations heated up by Army cooks.  The big KBR Dining Facilities are for big bases, not little outposts. 

The kitchen at the JCC in Samarra is of typical design. 

 

kitchen.jpg

If many of the Soldiers realized today was Veterans day, they didn't show it. 

I didn't really realize until I looked at my pocket calendar. 

For decades veterans were older men.  Now they are women and men in their early to mid twenties, many on their second tour in a combat zone. 

They were not drafted.  They did not join when the entire nation was mobilized for war. 

They volunteered when the war in Iraq was unpopular.  They re-enlist knowing they will face a fight in Afghanistan. 

They are the ones willing to stand on the wall that protects the modern culture--the plastic-disposable-drive-thru-strip-mall culture of America from the people who want to burn it all down. 

Too many of the people in the drive-thru culture went about their day today without realizing what the young men I was with today do for them. 

It is a luxury they enjoy because Soldiers, Sailors, Marines and even Airmen will leave the plastic world and enter the real world.

JD relies on viewer support to keep reporting from the war zone. Please hit the tip jar or buy a dvd.
 
 btn_buydvd.gif

 

 
Nov 09 2009
Is This What Victory Looks Like?
Written by JD Johannes   
Monday, 09 November 2009

I do not know what victory looks like in a counter insurgency.  With the recent bombing in Baghdad it is hard to say that a true victory and a true peace has been achieved.  There are still deadly attacks on US troops.

The true success of the war in Iraq will be revealed in the coming months and years.

But what is for sure is that the fight is now being waged by the Iraqi police and, to a lesser degree, the Iraqi army.

After full implementation of the Status of Forces Agreement on June 30th 2009, the US role in the remaining counter insurgency has dwindled.  The US Forces in Iraq are no longer waging an active war against violent extremist networks, their role now is stability, economics, governance and training.

The US Forces Iraq fill a gap between the central government of Iraq and local government.

Here in Saladin province north of Baghdad the 4th Brigade of the 1st Infantry Division is rapidly adapting to the new normal.

In 2007 during the troop surge the 4th Brigade was deployed to some of the roughest parts of Baghdad like West Rashid, Ammel, Bayaa and Rustamya.  I was embedded with unis from the 4th Brigade in 2007 and filmed the soldiers as they actively hunted down Jaish al Mahdi and Al Qaida cells and shot it out with hidden gunmen.  I went with them on grueling daily patrols through the neighborhoods to conduct census and intelligence gathering missions.

In 2007 the Iraqi Army and Police were in the background and at best they were merely ineffective, at worst they were aligned with the active enemy.

Now, in late 2009, the 4th is back in Iraq in the area around Tikrit with a whole new mission.

Read more...
 
Nov 03 2009
Free Speech on the Cheap
Written by JD Johannes   
Tuesday, 03 November 2009

This line from a Washington Post story jumped out at me:

"The arrival of war dead at Dover has long pitted free speech advocates against the government, which had been accused of using the ban to hide the horror of war from the public--especially as casualty rates in Iraq and Afghanistan began to climb."

The article is by Christian Davenport.

I'm at a little outpost in northern Iraq, fresh back from a patrol where we met with a local Sheik.  The previous day I had rode with US Soldiers to a logistics base on a resupply run and while there picked up a few back issues of Stars and Stripes where I read the story.

In the story, a previous graph has a quote from University of Delaware Journalism Professor Ralph Begleiter one of the above mentioned free speech advocates.  Begeleiter said, "Taking pictures of the returning casualties to Dover is a measure of the human cost of war.  Do you want the government ultimately to have control over what we see or not see?  Or do you want independent observers, an independent press or media, relaying those images?"

Mr. Begleiter if you really want to understand the human cost of war, don't stand on a fucking tarmac, get embedded and see the human cost of war up close and personal where the price is actually paid.

But many of the free speech advocates have no desire to put themselves at risk to tell the stories of the women and men who have willingly put themselves in harms way.

They want to do it on the cheap, standing on concrete in the US at a scheduled time rather than face the capricious hazards of war standing on the sands of Iraq or rocks of Afghanistan.

Many of those free speech advocates are interested only in the Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines as props.  As the story illustrates, very few of the arrivals at Dover are covered by the media.

When a reporter is embedded with US forces they at least have to share some of the risks and possibly themselves become another account in the human cost of war.

I have been ready to pay that price for the last five years and nearly had to pay it a few times.  How many of the so-called speech advocates have been willing to pay that price?

 

JD relies on viewer support to keep reporting from the war zone. Please hit the tip jar or buy a dvd.
 
 btn_buydvd.gif
 
Jul 27 2009
Destination Afghanistan
Written by JD Johannes   
Monday, 27 July 2009
Afghan visa, approval letter, plane tickets, video tapes, batteries, body armor, couple changes of clothes.

I take off for Afghanistan in a few days. 

It had been my intent to be there a few months ago, but God a had a different plan.  Everytime there was a delay, something happened that made realize it was a good thing I was in the United States.

A close friend and business partner passed away suddenly in early June and it was a good thing I was here to manage some of his ongoing business affairs.

During that time other opportunities arose that, if I had not been here, would not have worked out.

And then my father had a massive heart attack in late June.  He is still recovering in the hospital.  I spent the last month working on his cattle ranch, tending to more than 300 head of cattle and bringing them to market only a few days ago.

It was a very good thing I was in the United States to be with my parents.

And now, just days away from arriving in Afghanistan part of me is asking, "God, got anymore surprises in store?"

Since 2005, when I started living the life fantastic running around war zones with a camera, I have had to place my trust in God and accept his sovereignty.  There are too many variables in war to account for let alone attempt to control.  Worrying about them is a waste.

I am not sure how long this expedition will last...three weeks, three months...I am just happy to be getting back to telling the stories of Soldiers and Marines and providing some of the information needed for people to understand the war.

These expeditions are not cheap.  As my friend Michael Yon pointed out in the tag to his last dispatch, he is not sure if he can keep operating after September.

I finance the majority of the costs of these trips through DVD sales .

If you can afford to buy a DVD, please do.

As long as the DVDs keep selling , I'll keep going to the wars.

Until my next post....Non Timebo Mala.

 
Jun 17 2009
The Old Way of War
Written by JD Johannes   
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
Max Boot's article in today's Wall Street Journal makes a point I have made on many occasions--the need to keep a cadre of Officers and NCOs in combat theatres for years.

Boot even uses an example I used a few months ago, the British Soldier/Diplomat Robert Warburton .

The British in the 19th century faced the same challenges we face.  Indeed, the only thing that has changed in Afghanistan is the technology of the weaponry.

In my pre-deployment reading there is a recurring theme to these works, one summed up best by Robert Warburton:

"...to deal with Afghans, officers must be employed who have knowledge of their languages, customs and ways."

That quote comes from Warburton's memoir "Eighteen Years in the Khyber."

Let the title of the book sink in for a moment.  Eighteen Years stationed in and around the Khyber pass.

In the Victorian era, British officers may have spent an entire career abroad, but with generous grants of leave.

According to Boot, General Stanley McChrystal is moving to develop a small cadre of AfPak experts who will work in the same provinces for years rather than one deployment or in a shorter deployment rotation where they always return to the same general area.

I saw the utility of this during my time with the Marines in Al Anbar province Iraq.  The Marines of Vengeance Platoon deployed to Fallujah in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

By the Summer of 2007 Sgt. Stephen Schlau, who was a PFC in 2005 when he first deployed, was an old hand in the region.  There was no learning curve.  The seven months deployed, five months home rotation was tough, but highly effective.

The strategy of creating a cadre of Officers and NCOs who work the same villages and provinces for years is sound.  It has worked before and will work again.

The only question is does the administration have the patience to create a modern generation of Warburtons who may spend 18 years in the Khyber?
 
May 27 2009
Afghanistan Expedition
Written by JD Johannes   
Wednesday, 27 May 2009

I am beginning to feel a bit like Captain Willard in the opening scenes of the movie Apocalypse Now.

No, I'm not getting stoned, doing shots and practicing kung fu in my underwear, but I am ready for the next mission.  This one is to Afghanistan.

I just got my transit date for mid-July and am making all the logistical arrangements.

This trip is significantly more expensive than Iraq.  It is almost double the cost of an Iraq expedition.

I finance these trips with DVD sales .

The important work is not so much the final filmed product but the on the ground reporting.

To fully finance this trip I need to sell another 143 DVDs this month and 250 in June.

The coming months will be a critical time in Afghanistan as General Petraeus and Lt. Gen. McChrystal begin implementing what could be the final push to wrest the Taliban from their strongholds.

It will be important to have as many eyes, ears and camera lenses on the ground as possible.

Another 393 DVDs sold will put me there.

You can also purchase them through Amazon.com .

This is not my first trip to the rodeo.  I've covered the wars since 2005.  I know the risks and accept them because the work is important.

The news is too important to be left solely to the MSM.

If you can afford to please purchase a DVD, or you can also make a contribution via paypal.

I will go wherever the story is and have no compunction against putting myself in harms way.  I just would like a little help with the airfare.

JD

 
May 22 2009
Negotiating with Persians
Written by JD Johannes   
Friday, 22 May 2009
"Now you can take back our answer, which is that we consider that, if the case of becoming friends with the King, we shall be more valuable friends if we retain our arms than if we surrender them; and if it is a case of fighting, we shall fight better if we retain our arms." 

That was response of the Greek General Clearchus to the amabassadors of the Persian King Ataraxerxes.  And it will be similar to the response the Iranians give to President Obama.

In 401 B.C., a group fo 10,000 Greek mercenaries joined an ill-fated attempt by Cyrus the Younger to seize the throne of the Persian empire from Ataraxerxes.  Cyrus was killed in battle and the Greeks were on their own, deep in Persian territory along the Tigris river.

One of the King's ambassador's made the Persian position clear:

"The Kind considers that, since he killed Cyrus, the victory is his.  He thinks that you, too, are in his power, since he has got you in the middle of his territories, surrounded by impassable rivers, and can bring against you such masses of men that you could never kill them all."

The Persian King clearly felt he was operating from a position of strength in demanding the Greeks surrender their arms, but he was not understanding the absolute logic of the situation as the Greeks viewed it.

Two Greek officers made their responses. 

Proxenus said, "[is] the King asking for our arms by right of conquest or as gifts to show our friendship.  If it is by right of conquest, why should he have to ask us for them instead of coming to take them?"

But Theopompus made the logic clear to all:

"The only things of value which we have at present are our arms and our courage.  So long as we keep our arms we fancy that we can make good use of our courage; but if we surrender our arms we shall lose our lives as well.  So do not imagine that we are going to surrender to you our only valuables."

In the current era of negotiations with the Persians, who are now called Iran, they are employing the logic of the Greeks.

The potential of a nuclear weapon is their most valuable asset.

If the US truly wants to be friends with the Iranians and wishes them no ill will, why do we care if they have nukes?  The US gets along fine with other nuclear powers.

And the US is such a dominant power, why don't they just come and take the weapons away?

The Greeks understood that King Ataraxerxes was not in a truly dominant position and were not certain if the King really wanted friendship.

The Greeks kept their arms and their journey out was chronicled by their eventual leader, Xenophon in the book 'The Persian Expedition.'

President Obama is, in some ways, in the position of Ataraxerxes and the Iranians know it.

In middle eastern culture, the person seeking to negotiate is seen as being in a position of weakness.

We in the west for some reason have adopted negotiation as the default political position and are ignoring the absolute logic of the situation.

The most valuable thing the Iranian regime possess is the threat of nuclear weapons.  If they give it up and the US reneges on any promises, the Iranians have nothing.

Therefore the Iranians will respond like Clearchus.

"Now you can take back our answer, which is that we consider that, if the case of becoming friends with the King, we shall be more valuable friends if we retain our arms than if we surrender them; and if it is a case of fighting, we shall fight better if we retain our arms." 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 10 of 44